注册 | 登录 | 充值

首页-> 学术资讯 -> 文献解读

【热门文献】半剂量倍他米松与全剂量倍他米松对早产风险妇女的新生儿结局

文献解读

2022-09-01      

946 0

Prof Thomas Schmitz, MD et al.LANCET.August 20, 2022. 


早产前建议产前使用倍他米松,以加速胎儿肺成熟。然而,有关生长和神经发育剂量相关副作用的报告表明,目前的剂量(12 mg加12 mg,间隔24小时)可能过高。因此,我们研究了半剂量在预防呼吸窘迫综合征方面是否不劣于目前的全剂量。


在3244例分娩中,意向治疗分析中,半剂量组1567名新生儿中有313名(20.0%)发生主要转归,全剂量组1574名新生儿中有276名(17.5%)发生主要转归(风险差异2.4%,95% CI - 0.3 ~ 5.2);因此,非劣等性没有表现出来。


由于未显示半剂量方案与全剂量方案的非劣效性,我们的结果不支持产前减少倍他米松剂量的实践改变。


Abstract

Background

Antenatal betamethasone is recommended before preterm delivery to accelerate fetal lung maturation. However, reports of growth and neurodevelopmental dose-related side-effects suggest that the current dose (12 mg plus 12 mg, 24 h apart) might be too high. We therefore investigated whether a half dose would be non-inferior to the current full dose for preventing respiratory distress syndrome.

Methods

We designed a randomised, multicentre, double-blind, placebo-controlled, non-inferiority trial in 37 level 3 referral perinatal centres in France. Eligible participants were pregnant women aged 18 years or older with a singleton fetus at risk of preterm delivery and already treated with the first injection of antenatal betamethasone (11·4 mg) before 32 weeks’ gestation. We used a computer-generated code producing permuted blocks of varying sizes to randomly assign (1:1) women to receive either a placebo (half-dose group) or a second 11·4 mg betamethasone injection (full-dose group) 24 h later. Randomisation was stratified by gestational age (before or after 28 weeks). Participants, clinicians, and study staff were masked to the treatment allocation. The primary outcome was the need for exogenous intratracheal surfactant within 48 h after birth. Non-inferiority would be shown if the higher limit of the 95% CI for the between-group difference between the half-dose and full-dose groups in the primary endpoint was less than 4 percentage points (corresponding to a maximum relative risk of 1·20). Four interim analyses monitoring the primary and the secondary safety outcomes were done during the study period, using a sequential data analysis method that provided futility and non-inferiority stopping rules and checked for type I and II errors. Interim analyses were done in the intention-to-treat population. This trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02897076.

Findings

Between Jan 2, 2017, and Oct 9, 2019, 3244 women were randomly assigned to the half-dose (n=1620 [49·9%]) or the full-dose group (n=1624 [50·1%]); 48 women withdrew consent, 30 fetuses were stillborn, 16 neonates were lost to follow-up, and 9 neonates died before evaluation, so that 3141 neonates remained for analysis. In the intention-to-treat analysis, the primary outcome occurred in 313 (20·0%) of 1567 neonates in the half-dose group and 276 (17·5%) of 1574 neonates in the full-dose group (risk difference 2·4%, 95% CI –0·3 to 5·2); thus non-inferiority was not shown. The per-protocol analysis also did not show non-inferiority (risk difference 2·2%, 95% CI –0·6 to 5·1). No between-group differences appeared in the rates of neonatal death, grade 3–4 intraventricular haemorrhage, stage ≥2 necrotising enterocolitis, severe retinopathy of prematurity, or bronchopulmonary dysplasia.

Interpretation

Because non-inferiority of the half-dose compared with the full-dose regimen was not shown, our results do not support practice changes towards antenatal betamethasone dose reduction.


文章连接:

https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(22)01535-5/fulltext



科研资讯(站内):

百度浏览   来源 : 医微客   


版权声明:本网站所有注明来源“医微客”的文字、图片和音视频资料,版权均属于医微客所有,非经授权,任何媒体、网站或个人不得转载,授权转载时须注明来源:”医微客”。本网所有转载文章系出于传递更多信息之目的,且明确注明来源和作者,转载仅作观点分享,版权归原作者所有。不希望被转载的媒体或个人可与我们联系,我们将立即进行删除处理。 本站拥有对此声明的最终解释权。

科研搜索(百度):医学科研





发表评论

注册或登后即可发表评论

登录注册

全部评论(0)

没有更多评论了哦~

科研资讯 更多>>
  • 肿瘤电场治疗Optune Lua获批治疗..
  • 成本更低的实体瘤抗癌新星:CAR-..
  • 文献速递-子宫内膜癌中的卵黄囊..
  • Nature|MSCs首次用于人体跟腱病..
  • 推荐阅读 更多>>
  • 【热门文献】不同药物治疗糖尿病..
  • 【热门文献】抗病毒新时代:替科..
  • 阿斯利康新副总裁上任,来自诺华..
  • 疫情下的儿科就诊知多少?..
    • 相关阅读
    • 热门专题
    • 推荐期刊
    • 学院课程
    • 医药卫生
      期刊级别:国家级期刊
      发行周期:暂无数据
      出版地区:其他
      影响因子:暂无数据
    • 中华肿瘤
      期刊级别:北大核心期刊
      发行周期:月刊
      出版地区:北京
      影响因子:1.90
    • 中华医学
      期刊级别:CSCD核心期刊
      发行周期:周刊
      出版地区:北京
      影响因子:0.94