注册 | 登录 | 充值

首页-> 学术资讯 -> 临床研究

P接近0.05,可以有100种英文描述方法?!

临床研究

1970-01-01      

2858 0

写在前面:小咖在找文章素材的时候,从一篇论文的引用文献中发现了一篇很有意思的文章,题目为“如果你的P值刚好和0.05擦肩而过,你会咋办?”。看完之后,深感英文的文字游戏也可以玩得这么溜。到底说了些啥呢,大家耐心看下去,越到后面越有意思。

 

如果你的P值刚好和0.05擦肩而过,你该咋办?

 

尝试了各种合适的统计学方法,P值依然稳稳地略高于0.05,你应该得出结论“无统计学意义(non-significant)”,并这样写到文章里。然而,对于很多作者来说,这并不是他们想寻找的答案:因为感觉发布“阴性结果”的文章要比“阳性结果”的文章难呀。

 

很多人的解决方案就是采用由来已久的迂回策略,将无统计学意义的结果装扮地更有趣。下面这个列表,来自于同行评审期刊中的文章,这些文章的共同点是:(1)作者设定P<0.05为具有统计学意义;(2)结果未能达到P<0.05;(3)文章在描述的时候让P值看起来更有意思了。

 

(注:为了原汁原味的展示作者们的有趣措辞,以下英文描述不再翻译,咳咳,其实是小咖不知道该怎么翻译。。。)

 

  • hint of significance (p>0.05)

  • only a little short of significance (p>0.05)

  • a strong tendency towards statistical significance (p=0.051)

  • significantly better overall (p=0.051)

  • slightly missed the margin of significance (p=0.051)

  • narrowly avoided significance (p=0.052)

  • not exactly significant (p=0.052)

  • a possible trend toward significance (p=0.052)

  • (barely) not statistically significant (p=0.052)

  • borderline level of statistical significance (p=0.053)

  • just lacked significance (p=0.053)

  • at the very edge of significance (p=0.053)

  • on the cusp of conventional statistical significance (p=0.054)

  • at the limit of significance (p=0.054)

  • close to being statistically significant (p=0.055)

  • not unequivocally significant (p=0.055)

  • noticeably significant (p=0.055)

  • on the boundary of significance (p=0.055)

  • very closely approaches the conventional significance level (p=0.055)

  • weakly statistically significant (p=0.0557)

  • better trends of improvement (p=0.056)

  • near to statistical significance (p=0.056)

  • just marginally significant (p=0.0562)

  • at the verge of significance (p=0.058)

  • just borderline significant (p=0.058)

  • hovered at nearly a significant level (p=0.058)

  • in the edge of significance (p=0.059)

  • on the threshold of significance (p=0.059)

  • virtually significant (p=0.059)

  • on the very borderline of significance (0.05

  • an observed trend (p=0.06)

  • approached near significance (p=0.06)

  • at the brink of significance (p=0.06)

  • barely outside the range of significance (p=0.06)

  • close to being significant (p=0.06)

  • equivocal significance (p=0.06)

  • just outside the traditional bounds of significance (p=0.06)

  • leaning towards statistical significance (p=0.06)

  • not as significant (p=0.06)

  • not currently significant (p=0.06)

  • slight non-significance (p=0.06)

  • slightly exceeded significance level (p=0.06)

  • tended to be significant (p=0.06)

  • almost significant tendency (p=0.06)

  • an inverse trend toward significance (p=0.06)

  • slightly failed to reach statistical significance (p=0.061)

  • slightly missed the conventional level of significance (p=0.061)

  • fell narrowly short of significance (p=0.0623)

  • near nominal significance (p=0.064)

  • not significant in the normally accepted statistical sense (p=0.064)

  • very nearly significant (p=0.0656)

  • closely approaches the statistical significance (p=0.0669)

  • barely failed to attain statistical significance (p=0.067)

  • slightly below the level of significance (p=0.068)

  • a considerable trend toward significance (p=0.069)

  • approaching clinical significance (p=0.07)

  • difference was apparent (p=0.07)

  • fell marginally short of significance (p=0.07)

  • just fails to reach conventional levels of statistical significance (p=0.07)

  • nearly reached a significant level (p=0.07)

  • slightly insignificant (p=0.07)

  • tendency toward statistical significance (p=0.07)

  • close to borderline significance (p=0.072)

  • a barely detectable statistically significant difference (p=0.073)

  • slightly outside the significance level (p=0.077)

  • did not quite reach conventional levels of statistical significance (p=0.079)

  • a trend close to significance (p=0.08)

  • an expected trend (p=0.08)

  • approaching, although not reaching, significance (p=0.08)

  • not significant in the formal statistical sense (p=0.08)

  • not very definitely significant from the statistical point of view (p=0.08)

  • almost non-significant (p=0.083)

  • not fully significant (p=0.085)

  • approaching a level of significance (p=0.089)

  • not highly significant (p=0.089)

  • approaching, but not reaching, significance (p<0.09)

  • a numerical trend (p=0.09)

  • a significant trend (p=0.09)

  • a small trend (p=0.09)

  • highly significant (p=0.09)

  • tended to approach significance (p=0.09)

  • does not reach the conventional significance level (p=0.098)

  • very slightly significant (p<0.1)

  • almost clinically significant (p<0.10)

  • an adverse trend (p=0.10)

  • essentially significant (p=0.10)

  • not entirely significant (p=0.10)

  • possibly statistically significant (p=0.10)

  • very slightly non-significant (p=0.10)

  • tantalisingly close to significance (p=0.104)

  • approaching formal significance (p=0.1052)

  • not decisively significant (p=0.106)

  • tentatively significant (p=0.107)

  • verged on being significant (p=0.11)

  • possibly marginally significant (p=0.116)

  • fell just short of statistical significance (p=0.12)

  • fell somewhat short of significance (p=0.138)

  • approaches but fails to achieve a customary level of statistical significance (p=0.154)

  • close to the limit of significance (p=0.17)

  • a very slight trend toward significance (p=0.20)

 

受篇幅所限,上面列表随机抽取了原文列表的五分之一,所以说不止100种,是有500种呀,想看完整版的可以查看下面这个链接:https://mchankins.wordpress.com/2013/04/21/still-not-significant-2/



科研资讯(站内): 临床研究,医学统计,研究设计,统计咨询,研究方法,研究进展,医咖会,研医论道,yikahui,yika

百度浏览   来源 : 医咖会   


版权声明:本网站所有注明来源“医微客”的文字、图片和音视频资料,版权均属于医微客所有,非经授权,任何媒体、网站或个人不得转载,授权转载时须注明来源:”医微客”。本网所有转载文章系出于传递更多信息之目的,且明确注明来源和作者,转载仅作观点分享,版权归原作者所有。不希望被转载的媒体或个人可与我们联系,我们将立即进行删除处理。 本站拥有对此声明的最终解释权。

科研搜索(百度):医学科研 临床研究,医学统计,研究设计,统计咨询,研究方法,研究进展,医咖会,研医论道,yikahui,yika





发表评论

注册或登后即可发表评论

登录注册

全部评论(0)

没有更多评论了哦~

科研资讯 更多>>
  • 肿瘤电场治疗Optune Lua获批治疗..
  • 成本更低的实体瘤抗癌新星:CAR-..
  • 文献速递-子宫内膜癌中的卵黄囊..
  • Nature|MSCs首次用于人体跟腱病..
  • 推荐阅读 更多>>
  • 当你在玩游戏时,别人已经从游戏..
  • 如何理解回归模型中的"调整"和"..
  • 你见过只纳入1篇文献的系统综述..
  • 前进法、后退法...细讲下这些自..
    • 相关阅读
    • 热门专题
    • 推荐期刊
    • 学院课程
    • 医药卫生
      期刊级别:国家级期刊
      发行周期:暂无数据
      出版地区:其他
      影响因子:暂无数据
    • 中华肿瘤
      期刊级别:北大核心期刊
      发行周期:月刊
      出版地区:北京
      影响因子:1.90
    • 中华医学
      期刊级别:CSCD核心期刊
      发行周期:周刊
      出版地区:北京
      影响因子:0.94