注册 | 登录 | 充值

首页-> 学术资讯 -> 文献解读

柳叶刀:指南指导的急性心力衰竭(STRONG-HF)药物治疗上滴定的安全性、耐受性和有效性

文献解读

2022-12-20      

1174 0


对于急性心力衰竭入院后指南指导的药物治疗的剂量和速度,缺乏证据。在这项多国、开放标签、随机、平行组试验(STRONG-HF)中,从14个国家的87家医院招募了18-85岁入院的急性心力衰竭患者,未接受指南指导的全剂量药物治疗。


在2018年5月10日至2022年9月23日期间,对1641名患者进行了筛查,发生心力衰竭再入院或180天前全因死亡(经调整后的风险差为8.1% [95% CI 2.9 - 13.2];p = 0·0021;风险比0.66 [95% CI 0.50 - 0.86])。与普通护理组(158[29%]/ 536)相比,高强度护理组(223[41%]/ 542)在90天内发生了更多的不良事件,但两组报告的严重不良事件发生率相似(88[16%]/ 92[17%])和致命不良事件(25[5%]/ 32[6%])。


急性心力衰竭入院后,快速提高指导药物剂量和密切随访的强化治疗策略很容易被患者接受,因为与常规治疗相比,它减轻了症状,改善了生活质量,并降低了180天全因死亡或心力衰竭再入院的风险。


Abstract

Background: There is a paucity of evidence for dose and pace of up-titration of guideline-directed medical therapies after admission to hospital for acute heart failure.

Methods: In this multinational, open-label, randomised, parallel-group trial (STRONG-HF), patients aged 18-85 years admitted to hospital with acute heart failure, not treated with full doses of guideline-directed drug treatment, were recruited from 87 hospitals in 14 countries. Before discharge, eligible patients were randomly assigned (1:1), stratified by left ventricular ejection fraction (≤40% vs >40%) and country, with blocks of size 30 within strata and randomly ordered sub-blocks of 2, 4, and 6, to either usual care or high-intensity care. Usual care followed usual local practice, and high-intensity care involved the up-titration of treatments to 100% of recommended doses within 2 weeks of discharge and four scheduled outpatient visits over the 2 months after discharge that closely monitored clinical status, laboratory values, and N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) concentrations. The primary endpoint was 180-day readmission to hospital due to heart failure or all-cause death. Efficacy and safety were assessed in the intention-to-treat (ITT) population (ie, all patients validly randomly assigned to treatment). The primary endpoint was assessed in all patients enrolled at hospitals that followed up patients to day 180. Because of a protocol amendment to the primary endpoint, the results of patients enrolled on or before this amendment were down-weighted. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03412201, and is now complete.

Findings: Between May 10, 2018, and Sept 23, 2022, 1641 patients were screened and 1078 were successfully randomly assigned to high-intensity care (n=542) or usual care (n=536; ITT population). Mean age was 63·0 years (SD 13·6), 416 (39%) of 1078 patients were female, 662 (61%) were male, 832 (77%) were White or Caucasian, 230 (21%) were Black, 12 (1%) were other races, one (<1%) was Native American, and one (<1%) was Pacific Islander (two [<1%] had missing data on race). The study was stopped early per the data and safety monitoring board's recommendation because of greater than expected between-group differences. As of data cutoff (Oct 13, 2022), by day 90, a higher proportion of patients in the high-intensity care group had been up-titrated to full doses of prescribed drugs (renin-angiotensin blockers 278 [55%] of 505 vs 11 [2%] of 497; β blockers 249 [49%] vs 20 [4%]; and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists 423 [84%] vs 231 [46%]). By day 90, blood pressure, pulse, New York Heart Association class, bodyweight, and NT-proBNP concentration had decreased more in the high-intensity care group than in the usual care group. Heart failure readmission or all-cause death up to day 180 occurred in 74 (15·2% down-weighted adjusted Kaplan-Meier estimate) of 506 patients in the high-intensity care group and 109 (23·3%) of 502 patients in the usual care group (adjusted risk difference 8·1% [95% CI 2·9-13·2]; p=0·0021; risk ratio 0·66 [95% CI 0·50-0·86]). More adverse events by 90 days occurred in the high-intensity care group (223 [41%] of 542) than in the usual care group (158 [29%] of 536) but similar incidences of serious adverse events (88 [16%] vs 92 [17%]) and fatal adverse events (25 [5%] vs 32 [6%]) were reported in each group.

Interpretation: An intensive treatment strategy of rapid up-titration of guideline-directed medication and close follow-up after an acute heart failure admission was readily accepted by patients because it reduced symptoms, improved quality of life, and reduced the risk of 180-day all-cause death or heart failure readmission compared with usual care.


文章连接:

www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(22)02076-1/fulltext



科研资讯(站内):

百度浏览   来源 : 医微客   


版权声明:本网站所有注明来源“医微客”的文字、图片和音视频资料,版权均属于医微客所有,非经授权,任何媒体、网站或个人不得转载,授权转载时须注明来源:”医微客”。本网所有转载文章系出于传递更多信息之目的,且明确注明来源和作者,转载仅作观点分享,版权归原作者所有。不希望被转载的媒体或个人可与我们联系,我们将立即进行删除处理。 本站拥有对此声明的最终解释权。

科研搜索(百度):医学科研





发表评论

注册或登后即可发表评论

登录注册

全部评论(0)

没有更多评论了哦~

科研资讯 更多>>
  • 肿瘤电场治疗Optune Lua获批治疗..
  • 成本更低的实体瘤抗癌新星:CAR-..
  • 文献速递-子宫内膜癌中的卵黄囊..
  • Nature|MSCs首次用于人体跟腱病..
  • 推荐阅读 更多>>
  • 柳叶刀:双内皮素拮抗剂阿普罗伊..
  • 柳叶刀:2022年疫情期间女性和非..
  • 屯感冒药以为护身符?3CL才是终..
  • 目前最好的新冠发展史综述!只看..
    • 相关阅读
    • 热门专题
    • 推荐期刊
    • 学院课程
    • 医药卫生
      期刊级别:国家级期刊
      发行周期:暂无数据
      出版地区:其他
      影响因子:暂无数据
    • 中华肿瘤
      期刊级别:北大核心期刊
      发行周期:月刊
      出版地区:北京
      影响因子:1.90
    • 中华医学
      期刊级别:CSCD核心期刊
      发行周期:周刊
      出版地区:北京
      影响因子:0.94